Core i3-9100 vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 229.2 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 1.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 229.2 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 1.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
810f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
66.74k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
229.2k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
3.8k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
17.79k
17.38k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.58k
5.17k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
3.16k (x0.36)
TOTAL
36.53k
29.52k (x0.81)
Multithread
i3-9100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.99k
15.28k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
66.31k
76.44k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.75k
27.48k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
3.02k (x0.68)
TOTAL
107.49k
122.2k (x1.14)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
13.95k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
22.21k
20.7k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
5.33k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
3.03k (x0.36)
TOTAL
51.84k
43.01k (x0.83)
Multithread
i3-9100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
58.56k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
86.17k
92.95k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.4k
28.55k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
2.98k (x0.65)
TOTAL
171.69k
183.04k (x1.07)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.81k
13.04k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
22.35k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
5.37k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.8k
3.4k (x0.71)
TOTAL
47.17k
44.15k (x0.94)
Multithread
i3-9100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
52.08k
56.49k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
87.45k
100.74k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.98k
28.21k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.04k (x0.72)
TOTAL
164.75k
188.49k (x1.14)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
28.03k
14.2k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
24.5k
23.23k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
5.35k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.48k
5.18k (x0.61)
TOTAL
66.74k
47.96k (x0.72)
Multithread
i3-9100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
107.5k
58.24k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
95.11k
105.72k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
28.73k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.57k
5.59k (x1.22)
TOTAL
229.2k
198.27k (x0.87)
Performance/W
i3-9100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1463 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
70 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
3526 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6675 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5833 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1365 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2018 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
15891 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4