Core i3-9100 vs i7-1185G7
Description
The i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 229.2 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 229.2 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
66.74k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
229.2k points
230.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
28.03k
24.35k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
24.5k
20.07k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
8.61k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.48k
7.84k (x0.92)
TOTAL
66.74k
60.87k (x0.91)
Multithread
i3-9100
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
107.5k
93.58k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
95.11k
94.71k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
33.28k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.57k
9.34k (x2.04)
TOTAL
229.2k
230.91k (x1.01)
Performance/W
i3-9100
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1463 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
70 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
3526 points/W
8247 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6675 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5833 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1365 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2018 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
15891 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4