Core i3-8350K vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Description
The i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 2.3 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 2.3 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
a70f41
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Phoenix
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
91 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2017
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
68.36k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.63k points
553.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8350K
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
32.74k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
24.19k
27.35k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
14.23k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.13k
27.41k (x2.46)
TOTAL
68.36k
101.73k (x1.49)
Multithread
i3-8350K
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
107.78k
236.69k (x2.2)
Test#2 (FP)
95.93k
202.63k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.65k
102.8k (x4.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.26k
11.28k (x1)
TOTAL
237.63k
553.41k (x2.33)
Performance/W
i3-8350K
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
1184 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1054 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
2611 points/W
18447 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8350K
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
6823 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6048 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1436 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2784 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
17091 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4