Core i3-8350K vs i7-12700H
Description
The i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2.7 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2.7 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
906a3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/4
14/20
TDP
91 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
October 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
68.36k points
93.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.63k points
643.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8350K
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
41.64k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
24.19k
25.48k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
13.2k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.13k
12.8k (x1.15)
TOTAL
68.36k
93.12k (x1.36)
Multithread
i3-8350K
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
107.78k
276.56k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
95.93k
251.6k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.65k
104.55k (x4.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.26k
10.58k (x0.94)
TOTAL
237.63k
643.29k (x2.71)
Performance/W
i3-8350K
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
1184 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1054 points/W
2188 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
2611 points/W
5594 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8350K
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
6823 points/GHz
8859 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6048 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1436 points/GHz
2808 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2784 points/GHz
2724 points/GHz
TOTAL
17091 points/GHz
19813 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4