| | | | | | |

Core i3-8350K vs i5-12500H


Description
The i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-8350K is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
906a3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/16
TDP
91 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
October 2017
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
68.36k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.63k points
225.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8350K
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
22.61k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
24.19k
17.73k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
9.63k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.13k
8.4k (x0.75)
TOTAL
68.36k
58.37k (x0.85)

Multithread

i3-8350K

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
107.78k
85.49k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
95.93k
94.93k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.65k
39.15k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.26k
6.08k (x0.54)
TOTAL
237.63k
225.65k (x0.95)

Performance/W
i3-8350K
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1184 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1054 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
2611 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8350K
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
6823 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6048 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1436 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2784 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
17091 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4