Core i3-8145U vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 3.7 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 3.7 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
50654
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
August 2018
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
34.48k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
75.13k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8145U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
17.78k
18.78k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
16.25k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
3.99k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.3k
6.8k (x5.25)
TOTAL
34.48k
45.82k (x1.33)
Multithread
i3-8145U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
28.06k
133.55k (x4.76)
Test#2 (FP)
34.83k
108.43k (x3.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
30.02k (x3.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
9.48k (x3.71)
TOTAL
75.13k
281.48k (x3.75)
Performance/W
i3-8145U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2322 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
170 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
5008 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8145U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4558 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3281 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
332 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
8840 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4