Core i3-8145U vs i7-7020U
Description
The i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the i7-7020U gets 73.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8145U is 1 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the i7-7020U gets 73.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8145U is 1 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
806ea
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2018
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
34.48k points
33.63k points
Mean multithread perf.
75.13k points
73.15k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8145U
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.78k
14.25k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
12.72k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
2.81k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.3k
3.86k (x2.98)
TOTAL
34.48k
33.63k (x0.98)
Multithread
i3-8145U
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.06k
31.11k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
34.83k
31.15k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
6.9k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
3.99k (x1.56)
TOTAL
75.13k
73.15k (x0.97)
Performance/W
i3-8145U
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
2074 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2322 points/W
2076 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
460 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
170 points/W
266 points/W
TOTAL
5008 points/W
4877 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8145U
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
4558 points/GHz
6196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3281 points/GHz
5528 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
332 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
TOTAL
8840 points/GHz
14624 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4