Core i3-8145U vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 3.7 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 3.7 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
a50f00
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Barcelo
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
34.48k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
75.13k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8145U
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.78k
18.57k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
22.03k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
9.55k (x3.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.3k
20.5k (x15.82)
TOTAL
34.48k
70.65k (x2.05)
Multithread
i3-8145U
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.06k
92.92k (x3.31)
Test#2 (FP)
34.83k
128.4k (x3.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
54.82k (x5.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
5.13k (x2.01)
TOTAL
75.13k
281.26k (x3.74)
Performance/W
i3-8145U
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2322 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
170 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
5008 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8145U
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
4558 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3281 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
332 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
8840 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4