Core i3-8145U vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8145U is 1.1 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8145U is 1.1 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
810f10
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2018
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
34.48k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
75.13k points
71.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8145U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.78k
10.73k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
18.15k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
3.99k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.3k
3.89k (x3)
TOTAL
34.48k
36.77k (x1.07)
Multithread
i3-8145U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.06k
20.11k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
34.83k
36.87k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
10.74k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
3.31k (x1.29)
TOTAL
75.13k
71.02k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i3-8145U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2322 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
170 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
5008 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8145U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4558 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3281 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
332 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
8840 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4