Core i3-8145U vs Mobile 3020e
Description
The i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 3020e is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8145U is 1.4 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8145U is 1.4 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
820f01
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Dali
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
34.48k points
29.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
75.13k points
52.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8145U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
17.78k
9.28k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
14.56k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
3.44k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.3k
2.06k (x1.59)
TOTAL
34.48k
29.34k (x0.85)
Multithread
i3-8145U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
28.06k
15.75k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
34.83k
28.63k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
5.87k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
2.17k (x0.85)
TOTAL
75.13k
52.42k (x0.7)
Performance/W
i3-8145U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
2625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2322 points/W
4771 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
979 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
170 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
5008 points/W
8737 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8145U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
4558 points/GHz
3570 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3281 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
332 points/GHz
792 points/GHz
TOTAL
8840 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4