Core i3-8130U vs Xeon E5-2667 v3
Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 3.9 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 3.9 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
306f2
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
February 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
343.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
20.99k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
11.9k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
4.72k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
3.75k (x1.34)
TOTAL
47.35k
41.36k (x0.87)
Multithread
i3-8130U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
172.62k (x4.52)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
110.03k (x2.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
44.06k (x5.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
16.93k (x6.85)
TOTAL
88.35k
343.64k (x3.89)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
2545 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4