Core i3-8130U vs i7-4600U
Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-4600U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i7-4600U gets 64.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i7-4600U gets 64.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
40651
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2018
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
28.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
64.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
14.37k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
8.31k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
3.35k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.96k (x1.06)
TOTAL
47.35k
28.98k (x0.61)
Multithread
i3-8130U
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
31.32k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
20.17k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
8.02k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
5.03k (x2.04)
TOTAL
88.35k
64.55k (x0.73)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
535 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
4303 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
4353 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
896 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
8781 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4