| | | | | | |

Core i3-8130U vs i5-5200U


Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
306d4
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Broadwell-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2018
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
68.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
13.58k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
12.14k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
3.18k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.92k (x1.04)
TOTAL
47.35k
31.81k (x0.67)

Multithread

i3-8130U

i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
28.89k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
28.74k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
7.31k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
3.74k (x1.51)
TOTAL
88.35k
68.69k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i3-8130U
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
1926 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
1916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
488 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
4579 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
5029 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
4497 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1176 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
1080 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
11782 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4