Core i3-8130U vs i5-12400F
Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 4.5 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 4.5 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
90675
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
February 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
33.85k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
20.33k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
10.51k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
11.77k (x4.2)
TOTAL
47.35k
76.46k (x1.62)
Multithread
i3-8130U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
174.21k (x4.56)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
141.31k (x3.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
64.86k (x7.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
19.01k (x7.69)
TOTAL
88.35k
399.39k (x4.52)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4