Core i3-8130U vs i3-1220P
Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i3-1220P gets 404.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 4.6 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i3-1220P gets 404.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 4.6 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
906a4
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Alder Lake-P
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
2/4
10/12
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2018
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
81.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
404.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
37.43k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
19.6k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
12.99k (x3.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
11.9k (x4.25)
TOTAL
47.35k
81.92k (x1.73)
Multithread
i3-8130U
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
178.85k (x4.68)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
153.82k (x3.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
69.38k (x7.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
2.69k (x1.09)
TOTAL
88.35k
404.74k (x4.58)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
6387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
5494 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
14455 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
8506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
2953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
2704 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
18618 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4