Core i3-8130U vs i9-11900KB
Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 6.1 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 6.1 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
806d1
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
24576 kB
Date
February 2018
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
24.09k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
19.54k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
8.48k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
11.68k (x4.17)
TOTAL
47.35k
63.79k (x1.35)
Multithread
i3-8130U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
220.79k (x5.78)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
225.98k (x5.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
79.1k (x9.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
11.32k (x4.58)
TOTAL
88.35k
537.18k (x6.08)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4