Core i3-8100 vs Xeon E3-1270 v2
Description
The i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 157.6 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.1 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 157.6 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.1 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
306a9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-H2
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /8
TDP
65 W
69 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2017
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
59.18k points
36.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.4k points
139.38k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-8100
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.52k
13.16k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.57k
12.51k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.96k
5k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.91k
5.62k (x0.71)
TOTAL
46.96k
36.29k (x0.77)
Multithread
i3-8100
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
53.4k
51.89k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
80.87k
57.35k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.03k
23.74k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
6.4k (x1.49)
TOTAL
157.59k
139.38k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i3-8100
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
822 points/W
752 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1244 points/W
831 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
293 points/W
344 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
2425 points/W
2020 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8100
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3757 points/GHz
3374 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5714 points/GHz
3207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2196 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
13044 points/GHz
9304 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4