Core i3-8100 vs Pentium G4560
Description
The i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 152.9 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.7 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 152.9 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.7 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
906e9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2017
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
59.18k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.4k points
89.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-8100
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
13.01k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
18.74k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
5.06k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.87k
7.4k (x0.94)
TOTAL
45.81k
44.21k (x0.97)
Multithread
i3-8100
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
52.88k
27.22k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
75.92k
43.79k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.52k
11.74k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
7.16k (x1.58)
TOTAL
152.86k
89.91k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i3-8100
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
814 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1168 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
300 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
70 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
2352 points/W
1665 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8100
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
3753 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5383 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1405 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2185 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
12725 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4