Core i3-8100 vs i7-4765T
Description
The i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-4765T is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 200.4 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 200.4 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
306c3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2017
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
59.18k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.4k points
134.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8100
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.47k
15.61k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
21.52k
8.8k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.95k
3.58k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
3.33k (x0.4)
TOTAL
59.18k
31.31k (x0.53)
Multithread
i3-8100
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
92.86k
66k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
83.05k
43.27k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.55k
17.39k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.93k
7.88k (x1.33)
TOTAL
200.4k
134.53k (x0.67)
Performance/W
i3-8100
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
1429 points/W
1886 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1278 points/W
1236 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
497 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
3083 points/W
3844 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8100
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
6797 points/GHz
5203 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5977 points/GHz
2932 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
1110 points/GHz
TOTAL
16438 points/GHz
10438 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4