Core i3-8100 vs i7-10610U
Description
The i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 200.4 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 200.4 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
806ec
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2017
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.18k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.4k points
162k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8100
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.47k
23.1k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
21.52k
20k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.95k
4.61k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
8.94k (x1.08)
TOTAL
59.18k
56.65k (x0.96)
Multithread
i3-8100
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
92.86k
73.36k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
83.05k
68.28k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.55k
13.73k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.93k
6.62k (x1.12)
TOTAL
200.4k
162k (x0.81)
Performance/W
i3-8100
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
1429 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1278 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
3083 points/W
6480 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8100
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
6797 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5977 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
16438 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4