Core i3-8100 vs i5-3340M
Description
The i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 157.6 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 2.5 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 157.6 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 2.5 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
306a9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2017
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
59.18k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.4k points
62.75k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-8100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.52k
11.51k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
20.57k
11.13k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.96k
4.4k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.91k
4.55k (x0.58)
TOTAL
46.96k
31.58k (x0.67)
Multithread
i3-8100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
53.4k
22.59k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
80.87k
25.49k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.03k
10.42k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
4.25k (x0.99)
TOTAL
157.59k
62.75k (x0.4)
Performance/W
i3-8100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
822 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1244 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
293 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
2425 points/W
1793 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3757 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5714 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2196 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
13044 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4