| | | | | | |

Core i3-7130U vs Celeron G1610T


Description
The i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 65.1 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.7 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
June 2017
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
42k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.89k points
38.59k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7130U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.77k
2.34k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
11.25k
6.54k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.61k
3k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.22k
2.74k (x0.65)
TOTAL
21.84k
14.62k (x0.67)

Multithread

i3-7130U

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.42k
4.67k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
25.28k
12.66k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.31k
5.95k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
2.53k (x0.7)
TOTAL
42.62k
25.8k (x0.61)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7130U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.94k
7.87k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
7.14k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
3.04k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
2.79k (x0.69)
TOTAL
32.11k
20.84k (x0.65)

Multithread

i3-7130U

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.39k
15.12k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
32.49k
14.05k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.58k
5.94k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.63k
3.48k (x0.96)
TOTAL
65.09k
38.59k (x0.59)

Performance/W
i3-7130U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
1359 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2166 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
572 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
4340 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7130U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3681 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5317 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1398 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1497 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
11892 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4