Core i3-7130U vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 90.9 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 90.9 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2017
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
42k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.89k points
71.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7130U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.77k
2.63k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
11.25k
7.84k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.61k
3.63k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.22k
2.93k (x0.69)
TOTAL
21.84k
17.02k (x0.78)
Multithread
i3-7130U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.42k
5.77k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
25.28k
24.15k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.31k
9.28k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
2.83k (x0.78)
TOTAL
42.62k
42.02k (x0.99)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7130U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.94k
11.67k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
14.02k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
4.53k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
2.93k (x0.72)
TOTAL
32.11k
33.14k (x1.03)
Multithread
i3-7130U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.39k
20.49k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
32.49k
31.32k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.58k
9.99k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.63k
3.03k (x0.83)
TOTAL
65.09k
64.82k (x1)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7130U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.99k
11.54k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
15.18k
19.69k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.67k
4.55k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
3.25k (x0.79)
TOTAL
32.94k
39.03k (x1.18)
Multithread
i3-7130U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.69k
19.25k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
34.96k
36.27k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
10.2k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.07k (x0.82)
TOTAL
68.13k
68.8k (x1.01)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7130U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.82k
10.73k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
16.18k
18.15k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.76k
3.99k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.89k (x0.92)
TOTAL
42k
36.77k (x0.88)
Multithread
i3-7130U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
40.25k
20.11k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
37.4k
36.87k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.07k
10.74k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
3.31k (x0.79)
TOTAL
90.89k
71.02k (x0.78)
Performance/W
i3-7130U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2683 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2493 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
605 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
278 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
6059 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7130U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6600 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5992 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1391 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1571 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
15554 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4