Core i3-7130U vs A6 3600
Description
The i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 65.1 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.5 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 65.1 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.5 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
300f10
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Llano
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2017
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
42k points
12.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.89k points
44.12k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7130U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
9.94k
4.03k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
4.25k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
2.19k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
1.54k (x0.38)
TOTAL
32.11k
12.01k (x0.37)
Multithread
i3-7130U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
20.39k
15.66k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
32.49k
16.66k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.58k
8.33k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.63k
3.48k (x0.96)
TOTAL
65.09k
44.12k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i3-7130U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1359 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2166 points/W
256 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
572 points/W
128 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
4340 points/W
679 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7130U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3681 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5317 points/GHz
1770 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1398 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1497 points/GHz
642 points/GHz
TOTAL
11892 points/GHz
5006 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4