Core i3-7100U vs m7-6Y75
Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 60.5 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.1 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 60.5 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.1 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
406e3
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100U
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
10.24k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
13.49k
15.33k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
2.97k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
5.32k (x1.36)
TOTAL
29.36k
33.86k (x1.15)
Multithread
i3-7100U
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
18.33k
16.78k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
31.08k
25.09k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
6.14k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.61k
5.58k (x1.55)
TOTAL
60.52k
53.58k (x0.89)
Performance/W
i3-7100U
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
1222 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2072 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
500 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
240 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
4035 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5622 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1624 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
12235 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4