| | | | | | |

Core i3-7100U vs i5-8350U


Description
Both models i3-7100U and i5-8350U are based on Kaby Lake architecture.

The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 79.6 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8350U is 1.4 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
806ea
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
38.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
112.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100U
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
16.74k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
13.45k
14.66k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
2.79k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
4.12k (x1.21)
TOTAL
33.38k
38.31k (x1.15)

Multithread

i3-7100U

i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
34.95k
51.05k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
33.53k
45.59k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
10.69k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.38k
4.78k (x1.42)
TOTAL
79.6k
112.12k (x1.41)

Performance/W
i3-7100U
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
2330 points/W
3403 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2235 points/W
3039 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
5307 points/W
7475 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5606 points/GHz
4650 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5606 points/GHz
4071 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1415 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
13909 points/GHz
10642 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4