Core i3-7100U vs i3-4150
Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-4150 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 79.6 k points while the i3-4150 gets 55 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.4 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 79.6 k points while the i3-4150 gets 55 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.4 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
40.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
20.5k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
13.45k
11.78k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
4.52k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.48k (x1.02)
TOTAL
33.38k
40.27k (x1.21)
Multithread
i3-7100U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
34.95k
26.29k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
33.53k
19.27k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
7.03k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.38k
2.42k (x0.72)
TOTAL
79.6k
55k (x0.69)
Performance/W
i3-7100U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
2330 points/W
487 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2235 points/W
357 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
45 points/W
TOTAL
5307 points/W
1019 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
5606 points/GHz
5856 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5606 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1291 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1415 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
TOTAL
13909 points/GHz
11505 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4