Core i3-7100U vs Celeron N5105
Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 57.3 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 57.3 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
906c0
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
8.66k
9.83k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
12.31k
9.74k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
3.65k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
3.88k (x0.99)
TOTAL
28.16k
27.1k (x0.96)
Multithread
i3-7100U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
17.87k
25.04k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
28.59k
24.7k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.68k
9.29k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
5.06k (x1.61)
TOTAL
57.28k
64.09k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i3-7100U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1191 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1906 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
512 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
210 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
3819 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3609 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5128 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
11735 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4