| | | | | | |

Core i3-7100 vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
51 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
140.76k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7100
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.01k
3.45k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
16.38k
9.96k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
4.26k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
4.27k (x1.07)
TOTAL
29.69k
21.94k (x0.74)

Multithread

i3-7100

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.1k
14.01k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
38.7k
37.68k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.69k
17.05k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
7.35k (x1.96)
TOTAL
63.24k
76.09k (x1.2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
19.17k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
10.55k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
4.79k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
4.65k (x1.17)
TOTAL
57.86k
39.16k (x0.68)

Multithread

i3-7100

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
73.13k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
42.06k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
18.03k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
7.54k (x2.1)
TOTAL
124.8k
140.76k (x1.13)

Performance/W
i3-7100
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
1759 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7100
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4