Core i3-7100 vs Pentium G3260
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 94.6 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.6 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 94.6 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.6 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
51 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
14.04k
11.73k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
20.55k
10.45k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.41k
4.55k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
3.83k (x0.96)
TOTAL
43.99k
30.56k (x0.69)
Multithread
i3-7100
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
30.09k
22.99k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
47.84k
20.53k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.13k
8.82k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
6.55k (x1.86)
TOTAL
94.59k
58.89k (x0.62)
Performance/W
i3-7100
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
590 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
938 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
1855 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
3601 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5268 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1386 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1024 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
11279 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4