Core i3-7100 vs i7-9750H
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 2.3 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 2.3 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
906ea
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
51 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
65.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
286.43k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
25.93k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
22.84k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
5.11k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
11.46k (x2.89)
TOTAL
57.86k
65.33k (x1.13)
Multithread
i3-7100
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
130.68k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
119.91k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
28.76k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
7.08k (x1.97)
TOTAL
124.8k
286.43k (x2.3)
Performance/W
i3-7100
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
2904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
2665 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
639 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
157 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
6365 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
5075 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
14519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4