| | | | | | |

Core i3-7100 vs i5-8350U


Description
Both models i3-7100 and i5-8350U are based on Kaby Lake architecture.

The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806ea
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
51 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
38.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
112.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
16.74k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
14.66k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
2.79k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
4.12k (x1.04)
TOTAL
57.86k
38.31k (x0.66)

Multithread

i3-7100

i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
51.05k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
45.59k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
10.69k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
4.78k (x1.33)
TOTAL
124.8k
112.12k (x0.9)

Performance/W
i3-7100
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
3403 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
3039 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
7475 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7100
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
4650 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
4071 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
10642 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4