Core i3-7100 vs i5-10210U
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
806ec
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
51 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
23.11k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
20.58k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
4.73k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
7.43k (x1.87)
TOTAL
57.86k
55.86k (x0.97)
Multithread
i3-7100
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
65.84k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
60.77k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
14.45k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
4.44k (x1.24)
TOTAL
124.8k
145.51k (x1.17)
Performance/W
i3-7100
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4