| | | | | | |

Core i3-7100 vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition


Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 2.6 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
860f01
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
51 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
327.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
15.5k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
22.96k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
8.78k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
8.5k (x2.14)
TOTAL
57.86k
55.74k (x0.96)

Multithread

i3-7100

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
110.78k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
149.38k (x2.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
60.88k (x4.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
6.68k (x1.86)
TOTAL
124.8k
327.72k (x2.63)

Performance/W
i3-7100
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
21848 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7100
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4