Core i3-7100 vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 2.7 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 2.7 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
860f01
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
51 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
15.48k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
22.82k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
8.63k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
7.17k (x1.81)
TOTAL
57.86k
54.11k (x0.94)
Multithread
i3-7100
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
117.98k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
146.43k (x2.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
65.54k (x5.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
4.77k (x1.33)
TOTAL
124.8k
334.72k (x2.68)
Performance/W
i3-7100
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4