Core i3-7100 vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.4 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.4 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
51 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7100
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.01k
3.89k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
16.38k
17.94k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
5.34k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
6.62k (x1.66)
TOTAL
29.69k
33.79k (x1.14)
Multithread
i3-7100
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.1k
15.07k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
38.7k
66.84k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.69k
19.56k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
6.54k (x1.74)
TOTAL
63.24k
108.01k (x1.71)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.04k
14.3k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
20.55k
21.69k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.41k
5.42k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
6.6k (x1.65)
TOTAL
43.99k
48k (x1.09)
Multithread
i3-7100
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
30.09k
55.45k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
47.84k
83.13k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.13k
20.76k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
6.58k (x1.87)
TOTAL
94.59k
165.91k (x1.75)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.41k
13.05k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.38k
22.88k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
5.39k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
7.31k (x1.47)
TOTAL
47.21k
48.63k (x1.03)
Multithread
i3-7100
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
30.48k
51.73k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
52.08k
87.74k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.97k
20.74k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.56k
6.57k (x1.44)
TOTAL
100.1k
166.79k (x1.67)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
14.48k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
23.84k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
5.43k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
5.46k (x1.37)
TOTAL
57.86k
49.21k (x0.85)
Multithread
i3-7100
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
54.39k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
88.77k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
20.04k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
5.48k (x1.52)
TOTAL
124.8k
168.69k (x1.35)
Performance/W
i3-7100
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4