Core i3-7100 vs A12 9800
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.2 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.2 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
660f51
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
51 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
January 2017
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
100.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
13.42k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
17.61k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
3.77k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
3.06k (x0.77)
TOTAL
57.86k
37.86k (x0.65)
Multithread
i3-7100
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
40.46k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
43.18k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
12.78k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
4.37k (x1.21)
TOTAL
124.8k
100.79k (x0.81)
Performance/W
i3-7100
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
1551 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4