| | | | | | |

Core i3-7100 vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.9 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806c2
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
51 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7100
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.01k
4.57k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
16.38k
17.21k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
9.97k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
14.98k (x3.76)
TOTAL
29.69k
46.75k (x1.57)

Multithread

i3-7100

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
8.1k
12.75k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
38.7k
45.98k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.69k
27.86k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
20.06k (x5.34)
TOTAL
63.24k
106.66k (x1.69)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
30.89k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
25.57k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
10.64k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
15.66k (x3.94)
TOTAL
57.86k
82.77k (x1.43)

Multithread

i3-7100

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
96.34k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
95.75k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
32.29k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
15.2k (x4.23)
TOTAL
124.8k
239.58k (x1.92)

Performance/W
i3-7100
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7100
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4