Core i3-7100 vs i7-11700F
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 4.1 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 4.1 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0671
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
51 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
32.55k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
26.95k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
10.76k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
19.32k (x4.86)
TOTAL
57.86k
89.58k (x1.55)
Multithread
i3-7100
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
232.06k (x4.24)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
203.56k (x3.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
72.89k (x5.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
3.81k (x1.06)
TOTAL
124.8k
512.32k (x4.11)
Performance/W
i3-7100
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4