Core i7-7020U vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 73.1 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 4.2 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 73.1 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 4.2 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
800f82
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
33.63k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.15k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7020U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
14.08k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
12.72k
22.56k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
5.19k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
16.71k (x4.33)
TOTAL
33.63k
58.53k (x1.74)
Multithread
i7-7020U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
31.11k
86.62k (x2.78)
Test#2 (FP)
31.15k
168.1k (x5.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.9k
43.51k (x6.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
5.16k (x1.3)
TOTAL
73.15k
303.4k (x4.15)
Performance/W
i7-7020U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
2074 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2076 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
4877 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7020U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
6196 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5528 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1679 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
14624 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4