Core i3-6100U vs Xeon E5-2680 v3
Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 6.1 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 6.1 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
306f2
Core
Skylake-U
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2015
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
36.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
426.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
18.86k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
12.19k
10.06k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
4.14k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
3.24k (x1.02)
TOTAL
30.73k
36.31k (x1.18)
Multithread
i3-6100U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
29.33k
218.93k (x7.46)
Test#2 (FP)
28.81k
139.75k (x4.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
55.47k (x8.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.33k
12.42k (x2.33)
TOTAL
69.94k
426.58k (x6.1)
Performance/W
i3-6100U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1956 points/W
1824 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
1165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
431 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
4663 points/W
3555 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5459 points/GHz
5716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5302 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1382 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
TOTAL
13362 points/GHz
11002 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4