Core i3-6100U vs Xeon E3-1270 v2
Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 56.7 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1270 v2 is 2.5 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 56.7 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1270 v2 is 2.5 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-U
Ivy Bridge-H2
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /8
TDP
15 W
69 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2015
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
36.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
139.38k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100U
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8.06k
13.16k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
12.85k
12.51k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
5k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
5.62k (x1.4)
TOTAL
28.06k
36.29k (x1.29)
Multithread
i3-6100U
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
51.89k (x3.13)
Test#2 (FP)
28.88k
57.35k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.38k
23.74k (x3.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.82k
6.4k (x1.68)
TOTAL
56.66k
139.38k (x2.46)
Performance/W
i3-6100U
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
752 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1925 points/W
831 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
492 points/W
344 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
254 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
3777 points/W
2020 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3506 points/GHz
3374 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
3207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1742 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
12201 points/GHz
9304 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4