| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100U vs i5-5300U


Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-5300U is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the i5-5300U gets 76.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5300U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
306d4
Core
Skylake-U
Broadwell-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2015
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
38.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
76.71k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100U
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
17.2k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
12.19k
14.53k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
3.44k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
3.12k (x0.98)
TOTAL
30.73k
38.29k (x1.25)

Multithread

i3-6100U

i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.33k
28.7k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
28.81k
35.19k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
9.24k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.33k
3.57k (x0.67)
TOTAL
69.94k
76.71k (x1.1)

Performance/W
i3-6100U
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1956 points/W
1914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
2346 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
431 points/W
616 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
238 points/W
TOTAL
4663 points/W
5114 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
5459 points/GHz
5931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5302 points/GHz
5011 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1382 points/GHz
1076 points/GHz
TOTAL
13362 points/GHz
13204 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4