Core i3-6100U vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 4.8 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 4.8 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
800f82
Core
Skylake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
15.75k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
12.19k
26.29k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
5.91k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
18.48k (x5.82)
TOTAL
30.73k
66.44k (x2.16)
Multithread
i3-6100U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.33k
94.49k (x3.22)
Test#2 (FP)
28.81k
182.53k (x6.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
45.95k (x7.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.33k
10.15k (x1.9)
TOTAL
69.94k
333.12k (x4.76)
Performance/W
i3-6100U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1956 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
431 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
4663 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5459 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5302 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1382 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
13362 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4