Core i3-6100U vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100U is 1.1 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100U is 1.1 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
11.13k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
12.19k
19.38k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
4.47k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
3.87k (x1.22)
TOTAL
30.73k
38.85k (x1.26)
Multithread
i3-6100U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.33k
17.13k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
28.81k
30.56k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
9.44k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.33k
4.09k (x0.77)
TOTAL
69.94k
61.23k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i3-6100U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1956 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
431 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
4663 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5459 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5302 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1382 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
13362 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4