Core i3-6100T vs N100
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
b06e0
Core
Skylake-S
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2015
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
15.23k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
11.04k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
5.54k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
4.98k (x1.44)
TOTAL
43.92k
36.79k (x0.84)
Multithread
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
37.07k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
32.57k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
14.75k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.9k (x1.01)
TOTAL
105.21k
88.29k (x0.84)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4