| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs i5-8350U


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-8350U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8350U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
806ea
Core
Skylake-S
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2015
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
38.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
112.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
16.74k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
14.66k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
2.79k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
4.12k (x1.19)
TOTAL
43.92k
38.31k (x0.87)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
51.05k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
45.59k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
10.69k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
4.78k (x1.24)
TOTAL
105.21k
112.12k (x1.07)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
3403 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
3039 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
7475 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
4650 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
4071 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
10642 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4