| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs i5-3330


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-3330 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 79.1 k points while the i5-3330 gets 104.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3330 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2015
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
29.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
104.78k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
10.46k
10.85k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
17.55k
10.47k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
4.21k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
4.31k (x1.41)
TOTAL
34.79k
29.84k (x0.86)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
23.92k
41.77k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
42.11k
40.2k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
16.11k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
6.7k (x2.61)
TOTAL
79.1k
104.78k (x1.32)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
683 points/W
542 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
522 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
300 points/W
209 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
2260 points/W
1361 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
3268 points/GHz
3390 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5485 points/GHz
3272 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
958 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
10872 points/GHz
9325 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4