Core i3-6100T vs Celeron G1610T
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the G1610T gets 25.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the G1610T gets 25.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-S
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
November 2015
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
38.59k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
2.34k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
6.54k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
3k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
2.74k (x1.24)
TOTAL
21.55k
14.62k (x0.68)
Multithread
i3-6100T
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
4.67k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
12.66k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
5.95k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
2.53k (x0.91)
TOTAL
50.49k
25.8k (x0.51)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
186 points/W
133 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
875 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
302 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
1442 points/W
737 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
980 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3832 points/GHz
2842 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
1305 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
690 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
TOTAL
6733 points/GHz
6357 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4