| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs Celeron 3855U


Description
Both models i3-6100T and 3855U are based on Skylake architecture.

Sky Lake is also known as 6th generation Core. Include Thunderbolt 3.0, SATA Express and Iris Pro graphics with DirectX 12. It uses LGA 1151 socket for mainstream models and LGA 2066 for X-Series. Sky Lake comes with AVX2 support in all mainstreams CPUs and AVX-512 in some high end models.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the 3855U gets 16.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 3 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
406e3
Core
Skylake-S
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2096 kB
Date
November 2015
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
19.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
24.56k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
1.64k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
6.72k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
2.06k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
2.4k (x1.09)
TOTAL
21.55k
12.83k (x0.6)

Multithread

i3-6100T

3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
2.2k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
9.59k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
2.76k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
2.27k (x0.82)
TOTAL
50.49k
16.81k (x0.33)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
186 points/W
146 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
875 points/W
639 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
302 points/W
184 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
151 points/W
TOTAL
1442 points/W
1121 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
980 points/GHz
1027 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3832 points/GHz
4201 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
690 points/GHz
1502 points/GHz
TOTAL
6733 points/GHz
8020 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4